Annual Conference and EventsCivic Health IndexCivic Data ChallengeThe Civic 50CivicNationAwards
NCOC Featured Discussion

Arizona Civic Health Lags the Nation

Study Prescribes Remedies for State’s Anemic Civic Health

September 23, 2010

(PHOENIX – September 23, 2010) Most measures of Arizona’s civic health lag those for the rest of the nation according to a report released today by the Center for the Future of Arizona and the National Conference on Citizenship. The study, entitled the "Arizona Civic Health Index," provides a detailed look at the serious disconnect between Arizona citizens, their elected leaders and their neighbors. The study also identifies opportunities for improving the state's civic health.

The report was presented at a public event at the Wyndham Phoenix Downtown by CFA Chairman and CEO Lattie Coor. In addition, NCoC Program Director Kristen Cambell presented data from the newly released national assessment entitled "Civic Life in America: Key Findings on the Civic Health of the Nation." NCoC began publishing a national index for civic health in 2006, and it has become the leading gauge of how well Americans are connecting to each other and to civic life. The Arizona report is the first of 13 state civic health studies to be published in 2010. It was sponsored by the Whiteman Foundation and the Flinn Foundation.

Five Overarching Results

The Arizona report provides a deeper understanding of the opportunities available and a yardstick for measuring the state's progress going forward.

Its five overarching results are:

1. Arizonans are not as well informed as people in other states.
2. Voter turnout continues to decline.
3. Arizonans are not as strongly connected to one another as people in other states.
4. There is an educational divide in citizen participation.
5. Arizonans feel a growing disconnect with the leaders they elect to represent them.

The "Arizona Civic Health Index" builds upon "The Arizona We Want: Gallup Arizona Poll" released in October 2009 by the Center for the Future of Arizona. One of the key findings of the Gallup research was that only 10 percent of Arizonans believe their elected officials represent their interests. In addition, only 12 percent of citizens believe the people in their community care about each other.

Whereas the Gallup Arizona Poll examined attitudes, the "Arizona Civic Health Index" measures citizen behaviors that influence government and actions that build community. Arizona citizens were benchmarked against citizens in the other 49 states and the District of Columbia. The report underscores the significant variations in participation rates among Arizona's citizenry based upon education, age, ethnicity and income. It finds that education and degree of social connectedness are the two key predictors of civic involvement.


Study Highlights: Citizen Actions that Influence Government

• With the exception of Tucson, Arizona lags national averages for voter participation, based on the 2008 election.

- Arizona voter registration (68.9%) lags the national average (71.0%).
- Arizona voter turnout (59.8%) lags the national average (63.6%).
- Tucson voter turnout (64.5%) exceeds the national average (63.6%) and Arizona overall (59.8%).
- Latino voter turnout (36.6%) trails other ethnicities. If Latino voters participated at the same rate as other ethnicities, Arizona's voter turnout would increase to approximately 65.5%, slightly above the national average of 63.6%.
- Young adult (18- to 29-year-olds) voter turnout (47.0%) lags the national average (51.1%) for young adults.
- Rural Arizona voter turnout (47.3%) is lower than urban voter turnout (61.7%) – the opposite of the national trend; 59.8% of rural Americans vote compared with 53.2% of urban citizens.

• Education level is a key predictor of voter turnout. College graduates participate at a significantly higher rate than other segments:

- High school diploma (48%)
- Some college (69%)
- College degree (80%)

• Political voice among Arizona's young adults (18- to 29-year-olds) is especially strong.

-Young adults have the second highest rate (40.9%) of any age group of Arizonans when it comes to having political discussions several times a week. Nationally, young adults are the least likely to discuss politics.

• Arizonans are not as well-informed as people in other states.

- Arizonans have the lowest rating for news consumption across all forms of media (traditional and online) compared with the 12 other states developing 2010 state-level civic health reports.
-More than 37% of Arizonans say they do not follow the news regularly.

Study Highlights: Citizen Actions that Build Communities

• Arizonans are not as strongly connected to one another as people in other states. Overall, Arizonans are below the national average for involvement with community organizations and being connected with family, friends and neighbors.

- 24.8% of Arizonans volunteer, two percentage points less than the national average (26.8%). However, Arizona volunteers contribute more time than the national average; 55.9% of volunteers give 12 weeks or more annually. They give less time to religious and social/civic organizations than the national average and more time to educational organizations and those that serve children.

- 64.1% of Arizonans do not belong to any community organization that meets at least once a month, attend no group meetings, and have not served as an officer or committee member – 3.4 percentage points higher than the national average.

- Latinos are less likely than other ethnicities to belong to an organization, the most common way for people to affiliate with others around a common interest or cause. An estimated 25.5% of Latinos are members of at least one organization – 12 percentage points lower than estimates for other ethnicities.

- Latinos participate in community meetings at half the rate of other ethnicities.

- 25% of Arizonans never talk with neighbors.

- Arizona ranks 48th in the nation for "exchanging favors with neighbors," a measure of social connectedness. Forty-nine percent (49%) of Arizonans say they never trade favors with neighbors.

- Tucson reports the highest rate for trading favors with neighbors (18.8%), four percentage points higher than the urban corridor as a whole and nine percentage points higher than rural areas.

- At 49.6%, Arizona ranks 38th in the number of individuals who gave at least $25 to charity in 2008-2009. The national average was 52.0%.

Next Steps

The "Arizona Civic Health Index" offers remedies for Arizona's anemic civic health, ranging from increasing voting rates in rural areas to encouraging greater participation in local community meetings.

Coor challenged Arizona communities to work with the Center for the Future of Arizona to create individualized local plans that empower citizens, increase civic involvement, and foster citizen well-being and a sense of connection to one another. The effort builds upon The Arizona We Want initiative, CFA's citizens' agenda based upon the issues for which the Gallup Arizona Poll found there is broad consensus.

"During the coming year, we will endeavor to create an action agenda, a timeline for implementation and a budget involving up to five communities," Coor said. "In addition, CFA will seek a partner from among the state's civic organizations to facilitate and coordinate a statewide civic renewal initiative."

"The center understands that the most powerful force in American democracy is the connection between and among citizens," said NCoC Executive Director David B. Smith. "It is our hope that Arizona can be a leader in the nation to use the Civic Health Index as a vehicle to help citizens solve local problems."

The "Arizona Civic Health Index" is available online at www.TheArizonaWeWant.org. The report is based upon an independent analysis of U.S. Census Current Population Survey data by The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE), based at Tufts University.
If you like this kind of content, sign up for an NCoC.net account and we'll customize your homepage recommendations based on your interests..
Find More Articles About...

 

7 Comments
By Adi Benning at 8:21 PM on Nov 4th, 2010

Check out this teen initiative to create bridges of understanding between native and nonnative teens. Was semifinalist in interantional Film Your Issue competition and was presented to SR White House staff.


www.youtube.com/watch?v=6z4DBqN7LfQ
By Adi Benning at 8:29 PM on Nov 4th, 2010
It's not all bad in AZ.
Honoring November National Native American Awareness Month:

16 year-old creates and gifts 80,000 copies of her book to all AZ 4th graders to create appreciation and understanding of
AZ Indigenous people, art, culture, history, military contributions promoting multiculturalism, diversity, childhood literacy and family literacy.
www.annicabenning.com
By Anonymous at 1:05 AM on Nov 15th, 2010
This article is a poor excuse to brush with the same paint all people who are politically labeled "Latinos" in Arizona. If one is talking about native Americans from Latin America then one must say so. If statisticians refuse to narrow their description of Latin Americans or their descendants, then any statistics produced by those statisticians, are misleading and only serve to encourage stereotyping and bigotry. Latin Americans are as divers as Americans and do not behave in a homogeneous way.
By Kristen Cambell at 3:21 PM on Nov 16th, 2010
Individuals’ race and ethnicity in census-related surveys, including the Decennial Census and the Current Population Surveys, are asked in various ways, including a multiple-choice question about“racial” groups with which one identifies with (a person can choose more than one), and whether a person self-identifies himself or herself as “Hispanic.” If a person identifies as Hispanic, then that person is asked about their specific Hispanic origin. Therefore, it is possible to calculate civic engagement levels by at least some of the major Hispanic groups based on a very large national sample (over 100,000 respondents), though we cannot guarantee that the sample in each group is representative due to limitations in any survey. However, we are not able to do so for Arizona because of a relatively small sample size (about 2000), we are not able to provide a reasonable reliable estimates of the engagement levels such as voter turnout by specific Hispanic groups. Additionally, the analysis is coded such that respondents are able to choose “Native American, Non-Hispanic.”

That being said, we do certainly recognize that Hispanic or Latino population represent many cultures, histories, and political backgrounds and that it is reasonable to assume that they do vote and otherwise engage differently and perhaps at different rates. To your point, this is true of other demographic groups as well, so while we don't want to create broad-stroke generalizations, it is important to understand generally characteristics of self-identified groups so we can better understand the civic actions, attitudes, and behaviors that they are most likely to engage in.
By Anonymous at 9:24 PM on Dec 9th, 2010
To be sure, the latest US Census has taught Americans that the words "Hispanic" and "Latino," including the political use of those words, does not in anyway equate to a monolithic ethnic, and, or monolithic racial group, so why encourage that kind of thinking through your article? Journalistic integrity requires that you NOT stereotype in such a way.
By Kristen Cambell at 2:24 PM on Dec 10th, 2010
Apologies if there is a misunderstanding about this information or what it is intended to convey— this piece is not a journalistic article, but rather a presentation of research. The findings represented here are the self-reported actions of a self-identified group of individuals (in addition to the explanation above, you can see more on methodology and collection methods here: http://ncoc.net/index.php?tray=content&tid=103ktop7&cid=103k143) No information here is intended to stereotype or convey judgment, but to understand the civic traits and characteristics of populations of the United States as they relate to civic participation rates. It is our hope that such data can assist in addressing civic gaps through development of policy, programs, and initiatives that meet the needs of all our communities and provide people meaningful opportunities to engage.
By Anonymous at 12:30 AM on Dec 12th, 2010
Apologies accepted, however, an article is an article and is therefore a journalistic endeavor whoever the author may be, and whatever its source. The terms "Hispanic" and "Latino" are defined by the US government, and as such are political terms. Any research relying on data that relies on political definitions cannot be scientific or objective, and, therefore, would be skewed. What you call self identification is actually compulsive identification; that is to say, government labeling imposed by political definition. Such labeling has enabled universal generalizations such as the ones that appear in your article and related report; universal generalizations that lead the reader into stereotypical conclusions not deserved by the good people of Latin America. The good people of Latin America use the terms "Hispanic" and "Latino" quite differently. In those countries the term "Hispanic" means white European, and the term "Latino(a)" is used to describe a person of a culture whose language derives from a Latin Language, such as Spanish or French or Portuguese. The good people of Latin American do not experience a metamorphosis when entering the United States that cause them to transform into a monolithic behavioral, racial, or ethnic group; however, the information in your article and related report conveys just that message.
Name:  (optional)
Email:  (optional)
  Comment:
 
  Enter the text you see in the image below.